Wednesday, June 2, 2010

an oil spill to puncture naivete

it was clear 2 weeks into the spill that the gulf would never be the same - at least to some of us - but it took until today for NOAA to come out and say it. "the public has an expectation that with technology we can solve the problem. We know we can't" (Doug Helton, NOAA's seattle-based Emergency Response Division.)

it was even clearer that this oil spill had something major to say about oil and drilling, in answer to Obama's political posturing to open up our shores to drilling just a month before. Something along the lines of "this is not the answer." but it took Obama until today to admit that "there are inherent risks to drilling four miles beneath the surface of the Earth -- risks that are bound to increase the harder oil extraction becomes."

the way I see it, these aren't risks. they are guarantees. because whether we burn the oil in our engines, or spill it before it gets to the pumps, it is choking the planet either way. we shouldn't get so worked up about the oil spill. just as much damage would have been done by carbon emissions from burning the oil if business had progressed as usual. Only, we wouldn't have been thinking about it.

the mass resistance we exhibit every day - both collectively and personally - to the present crisis of climate change is rooted in the same shallow naivete with which we continue to be amazed with how bad the oil spill is, letting awareness in step by step each week as our leaders put words to what we all know, deep inside.

that the gulf of mexico will remain a marred homage to our callous irresponsibility toward the planet through the lives of our children and our children's children has been the reality since week 2 of the spill. had the spill not happened, this same violence our society exhibits toward the planet would have been writ large on a thick sky and the ever accelerating temperatures through those same lifetimes. if it does alter the policy road Obama had started down, and raise the political ire to overcome the deadlock of our "leaders" on clean energy legislation, then i will ever after remember the oil spill with an ironic fondness.

however, whether that happens remains to be seen. so far, our response has been little more than the same old impotent outrage that conveniently distracts us from the fact that a spill like this was not an unfortunate accident; it is the absolute and necessary outcome of the course we have been pursuing.

criminal investigations into culpability on the part of BP, transocean and haliburton - as were announced today - need to be undertaken. But they need to be accompanied by a long hard look at things closer to home - from the history and structure of the MMS, down to each of our personal investments in a lifestyle dependent on oil-based transportation and disposable plastic goods.

denial has gotten us exactly where it was going to. now it's time to wake up and smell the black tar that has been smeared on the wall all along.

No comments:

Post a Comment